Kym has a keen ear for dialog:
she can hear the way different characters should talk, and the result is a
distinct voice for each. Mark’s characters all tend to talk just like Mark. But
Mark bravely jumps right into a scene while Kym endlessly stares at the screen
waiting for the right words to come. Kym constantly plays devil’s advocate when
it comes to defending the reader’s willing suspension of disbelief. If she
can’t buy it, she won’t let it happen. Mark, on the other hand, happily plows
through a scenario with little regard to where it comes from or where it’s
going. That has its advantages, though. Mark, being a college professor and
natural nerd, is never at a loss for how to phrase things. But he tends to
embellish, sometimes inserting too much literary texture (that’s the poet in
him coming through). Kym champions a more nonintrusive voice, constantly
reminding Mark of the kinds of books we both like to read.
Above all else, we prefer
escapism – mysteries by John Sanford, Sarah Peretsky, Greg Iles, and Val McDermid;
thrillers by Preston and Child, of course, but also those by John Case, Andrew
Klavan, Dan Brown, and Michael Crichton; warped fantasies (no dragons or elves)
by Jonathan Carroll, Christopher Moore, Mario Acevedo, and Ramsey Campbell;
sci-fi by Connie Willis, Charles Sheffield, Cordwainer Smith, John Barnes, Orson
Scott Card, and Cory Doctorow. These lists could go on and on.
Okay, we do sometimes read something
a little more high-brow. We like Laurie Wagner Buyer, Annie Proulx, Anita
Diamant, Sara Gruen, Stacy Richter, Lorrie Moore. And yes, we even read the
Pushcarts to keep our pulse on up-and-coming authors.
We read a lot because we think it
helps our writing. And we’re shameless when it comes to stealing techniques
that impress us. John Case gave The
Genesis Code a twist in the final sentence of the book. We liked it so well
that we added a final-sentence twist to The
Silverville Swindle – or we thought we had, until the editors read it. Days
before our novel went to press, we ate lunch with the publishers to pitch them
the sequel. When the conversation came back to the first book, they asked if we
planned to reveal the hidden identity of one of the major characters. We
thought we had through implied exposition along the way as well as in our final
sentence. They didn’t get it. We rushed home and rewrote the last two
paragraphs and final sentence, making that character’s identity unmistakable. It’s
a decision we’ve never regretted, and almost all of our readers tell us they
didn’t expect that ending. “Oh yeah,” one reader told us, “there were hints
throughout the book. I just didn’t put it together until the end.”
Here’s a perfect example of what
rigid writing can do to the quality of a story. We just knew the ambiguity at
the end of The Silverville Swindle
was enough to clue in our readers. We were wrong. We’ve been wrong about lots
of things in our co-writing endeavors.
Several years ago, we wanted to
tell an alternate history about Ankh-sen-amun, the wife of King Tut. We read
lots of books, did tons of research, and then sat down to outline the story
arc. We wrote extensive summaries for twenty-two carefully crafted chapters,
and thought to ourselves, “Man, this book is going to write itself!” While this
may work for some writers, the strategy completely killed our passion for the
project. We remained steadfast and followed our outline to every detail. By six
chapters, we’d gotten pretty bored. We hadn’t allowed the characters any voice in
where the story was going. We all became miserable, and that manuscript still sits
in a drawer at Chapter Six.
What’s become more workable for
us is to create a broad-stroke outline that gives us is the flexibility to
listen to our characters along the way. They may not always want to go where we
had originally planned, but we’ve discovered we’d best listen to them.
[This is an excerpt from an article by Mark and Kym that was published in an anthology entitled An Elevated View: Colorado Writers on Writing,
by Seven Oaks Publishing. To get your hands on this excellent
collection of writing advice, see the link on our blog to their
Website.]
No comments:
Post a Comment